Avo's Tear or The Sword of Aeons Page 3

Kato Si · 03-19-2006, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Drakan

yeah right

Evil will always dominate and feel better to me.

Your wrong Dark Drakan, Good always triumphs over evil.

Skorm_Knight · 03-20-2006, 03:55 AM

I'm neutral, just like in real life...

Kato Si · 03-20-2006, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skorm_Knight

I'm neutral, just like in real life...

I don't have anything against Neutral, somtimes I play Fable that way.

Ulicus · 03-20-2006, 02:36 PM

Hands up if you think the Swords of Aeons shouldn't have been toned down in TLC...

*raises hand*

It's meant to be THE artifact of Albion... if you know you can get a 'Good' sword that's just as good further down the line, then any temptation for a good character that might have been there is removed.

Yes, it would make the expansion part of the game easier - but so what? That would just make you feel more devious if you were evil, and more proud of the fact you'd resisted the temptation if you were good.

Bad Lionhead.

Dark Drakan · 03-20-2006, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kato Si

Your wrong Dark Drakan, Good always triumphs over evil.

Yeah i know

sucks to be bad in that aspect.

Kato Si · 03-20-2006, 07:24 PM

I agree making Aeons weaker was big mistake, they should have just made Avo's Tear 550 like Aeons was in the original. But like you said that takes away the temptation. But I look at it this way, it's nice that us goody good people get a reward for throwing Aeons away. I mean in the original I never through It away because you didn't get anything for it. But know you can get Avo's Tear, so the rewards are more even for both sides.

Crazyarms · 03-20-2006, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kato Si

I agree making Aeons weaker was big mistake, they should have just made Avo's Tear 550 like Aeons was in the original. But like you said that takes away the temptation. But I look at it this way, it's nice that us goody good people get a reward for throwing Aeons away. I mean in the original I never through It away because you didn't get anything for it. But know you can get Avo's Tear, so the rewards are more even for both sides.

I agree, because even though i was a hero, i would always take Aeons, and just try and make up for it.

Kato Si · 03-20-2006, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazyarms

I agree, because even though i was a hero, i would always take Aeons, and just try and make up for it.

I still take Aeons. It's my favroite sword.

Crazyarms · 03-20-2006, 09:57 PM

Even though you get Avo's Tear?

Kato Si · 03-20-2006, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazyarms

Even though you get Avo's Tear?

I do both on one file.

Seigfreid · 03-21-2006, 03:16 AM

Although they are equal, SoA looks cooler so...I pick SoA.

When being neutral, good and evil don't matter, you choose whichever benifits you more. Moral and conscience are nothing to you. If you do so happen to take good jobs more than evil then you are chaotic good, not neutral. The same goes for evil, if you choose evil more than good but still do good, then you are chaotic evil, not neutral. As one who is neutral this question will always come into your mind when you are faced with a good?evil decision: Which pays more, earns more, or grants more both now and later.

Now that I have taught you in the ways and followings of netrality, maybe you will show better respect for it.

Now for my other statement, since Kato chooses an evil decision he is therefore not completely good which leaves him at chaotic good. Which in terms means that he is mostly good but has some evil in him that will someday grow.

Kato Si · 03-21-2006, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seigfried

Although they are equal, SoA looks cooler so...I pick SoA.

When being neutral, good and evil don't matter, you choose whichever benifits you more. Moral and conscience are nothing to you. If you do so happen to take good jobs more than evil then you are chaotic good, not neutral. The same goes for evil, if you choose evil more than good but still do good, then you are chaotic evil, not neutral. As one who is neutral this question will always come into your mind when you are faced with a good?evil decision: Which pays more, earns more, or grants more both now and later.

Now that I have taught you in the ways and followings of netrality, maybe you will show better respect for it.

Now for my other statement, since Kato chooses an evil decision he is therefore not completely good which leaves him at chaotic good. Which in terms means that he is mostly good but has some evil in him that will someday grow.

Your actually wrong, taking the Sword of Aeons then throwing Jack's mask away makes up for that evil deed

Seigfreid · 03-21-2006, 03:42 AM

No, remember you killed your sister. You can never make up for taking the life of an innocent, no matter what you do.

Ranger · 03-21-2006, 06:29 AM

My fav weapon between those 2 is Avo's tear. Because you know, you don't have to kill your sister for it. But my fav weapon in the game is the Katana Hiryu.

Crazyarms · 03-21-2006, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seigfried

No, remember you killed your sister. You can never make up for taking the life of an innocent, no matter what you do.

Yes, but what if killing one innocent saves the lives of millions.