[White Knight]

Originally Posted by Mandaly

Arladerus, thank you for that explanation. It is very helpful. I had pictured something like the multiplayer 007 games. Where you can only see a gun sticking out of the screen and you chase other people around and shoot them...I HATE that game.

Goldeneye was a great game though.

[Arladerus]

Only if you meant Goldeneye 007. =)

I love it. I still can't beat Aztec on Agent, or any of the levels past and including Statue on Double 0 Agent.

No GameShark!

[Mandaly]

Originally Posted by The White Knight

Goldeneye was a great game though.

Don't get me wrong, I love the Bond games...just not the multiplayer version. Gives me motion sickness and I just cant hit anything, I always die. Even on slappers only...So frustrating.

Give me a good ole hack and slash or platformer game and I am set for hours....maybe days.....quite possibly weeks.

[White Knight]

Originally Posted by Arladerus

Only if you meant Goldeneye 007. =)

I love it. I still can't beat Aztec on Agent, or any of the levels past and including Statue on Double 0 Agent.

No GameShark!

Yes I meant Goldeneye 007. Why would anybody like Rogue Agent.

[Arseface]

I've realised that the reason I don't like MMOs (just then, actually), is that I hate having to cooperate with people to get **** done.

[Caboose]

Originally Posted by James Butts

Simply put:

It would be gay @ss cr@p that wouldn't work. And I would never get to play it because xbox live costs too much.

Bwahaahaaha.... funny thing that.

Xbox Live costs a sliver of what WoW players fork out.

Wow players fork out about 30 dollars a month (in Australia) to play it if you purchase Game Cards.

Xbox Live Players pay about 80 dollars for a 12 Month subscription, which, with the current logic, is.... let me just calculate this...

WoW: $360 a Year.

Xbox Live: $80 dollars a Year.

Hmm......

[Arseface]

I'm not sure if JB is a WoW player, because otherwise that argument holds no water. 80$ is still a sizable amount for an unemployed person to round up quickly, particularly a young one.

[hobbes_pwn]

Even machinia has gotten on to this theory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdr-ZmJhtYE

And No

[Caboose]

Originally Posted by Arseface

I'm not sure if JB is a WoW player, because otherwise that argument holds no water. 80$ is still a sizable amount for an unemployed person to round up quickly, particularly a young one.

I'm just saying, it ain't the dearest Online Gaming experience, ya know? it's pretty cheap when you get down to the nitty gritty.

[TEC]

I see why people would think this would happen but it would completly fail. Maybe when they finish the story arch finishes but right now it wouldn't happen as it's to small of an area to have it.

[ojox the blob]

No, there is no point in changing something this far into the series BUT the online if there is any should be one hell of an improvement, man it's so bad on Fable II, my friend refused to play with me because he had to be some nob good hero just so he didn't look like a complete retard with the evil fighting look. Terrible online choices and the online trading's just plain weird in Fable II, it's like " Yaaaaay, I'm going to give my friend XYZ a Master Longsword," and then you give it to some floating green circle, wtf is up with that?

[barnumspex]

id hate to see fable become an MMO it would destroy a beautiful series and make it repitative and boring

[nicomon]

Originally Posted by barnumspex

id hate to see fable become an MMO it would destroy a beautiful series

I agree... and to make it even be moderately good they would have to add so much new content that it wouldn't even be fable anymore

[White Knight]

Originally Posted by nicomon

I agree... and to make it even be moderately good they would have to add so much new content that it wouldn't even be fable anymore

read the date this thread ended a week ago.

[Arseface]

I wouldn't class a week old thread as dead. Two weeks probably does it for me.