|
Re: Person above you
^ corny. full of corn. makes jokes that are corny. his jokes can be discribed as corny. discribing his jokes as corny would be accruate in the case of the post above me. i am using the word corny to accurately discribe his post as he also did in his above post wich is above this one (assumeing nobody beats me to the post, in wich case i will have to use the edit function to compleatly change this post wich i am currently writing). he says its corny and i agree. therefor, that one was corny. it was corny, is corny, and always will be corny. and it is still corny. cornyness is what that joke is full of, and the joke is full or cornyness. the cornyness that it is full of is pure, therefore that joke is purely corny. cornyness is not pure, it is a form of coruption. therefor that joke is not purly corny, but rather purely corrupted by cornyness. that is all. thank you for reading. griffin out.
|
