plans fables 3,4 & 5!

[led_zepp123]

i was reading another thread just now, that was posted by 'good vs evil'
it was about some f2 videos that are out and i realised that no one had commented that PM had said that they were planning fable 3,4 and 5.
i recon its pretty big news.

but iv been thinking for a while now and cant relly figure where pm and the team could go from here theyve gone 500 years in the future but where to next any ideas?

[Zarkes]

yah i think it would be kewl 5 was in the near future and the hero would like bring back magic but i doubt it, also he said he wants to make some racing games because they are so generic

[Good Vs Evil]

they willl probably go like 500 more years in the future and do it like that

[Caboose]

Or they might go back into the past and Have a Prolog Fable or they might only go 200 or so years into the future so there isn't that much of a change

[SnowyFable]

Oh, awesome! Should I make this front page news?

[black.]

I doubt this is exactly Front Page material. Until we get some proven sources to back up this information(i.e Lionhead or Microsoft) I don't think it should be put on the Front Page. No offense to led_zepp123, but I think we should wait until one of our more trusted news guys, such as AlbionKnight or Jimbo, has confirmed this information before posting it up there. Just think, anyone can post news here in the Fable 2 Discussion Forum. I could go right now and make a thread that says "Fable 2 Pushed Back Until July '09". That doesn't necessarily mean that it's true. Now, if I had a proven source, a link to an article on one of the company's home pages, then the info should be believed. But I could just as easily be pulling everyone's chain, just trying to get attention or some laughs when people respond "Nooo!! This sucks!!". What I'm trying to say is, can you imagine if we put every single piece of "news" on the Front Page, and then had to go back and pull all of the fake ones off? I'm sure by the time someone realized that not all of the information on the Front Page was true, a bunch of people would have already read it, and gotten their hopes up(or down) for nothing. If we confirm everything before putting it on the Front Page, it saves a lot of time.

[Jimbo1425]

to be completely honest this as been news for a while now, and there has been a thread about this already as well and no one elso put it on the front page so i dont think it should be put up since most people knew about it for a long time and never put it up

there you go pretty old http://forums.projectego.net/molyneu...-3-4-5-a-8738/

[Goretex]

Originally Posted by black.

I doubt this is exactly Front Page material. Until we get some proven sources to back up this information(i.e Lionhead or Microsoft) I don't think it should be put on the Front Page. No offense to led_zepp123, but I think we should wait until one of our more trusted news guys, such as AlbionKnight or Jimbo, has confirmed this information before posting it up there. Just think, anyone can post news here in the Fable 2 Discussion Forum. I could go right now and make a thread that says "Fable 2 Pushed Back Until July '09". That doesn't necessarily mean that it's true. Now, if I had a proven source, a link to an article on one of the company's home pages, then the info should be believed. But I could just as easily be pulling everyone's chain, just trying to get attention or some laughs when people respond "Nooo!! This sucks!!". What I'm trying to say is, can you imagine if we put every single piece of "news" on the Front Page, and then had to go back and pull all of the fake ones off? I'm sure by the time someone realized that not all of the information on the Front Page was true, a bunch of people would have already read it, and gotten their hopes up(or down) for nothing. If we confirm everything before putting it on the Front Page, it saves a lot of time.

Confirmed.

And I do believe it's been posted before.











But we still love you, led.

[Dark Drakan]

Yeah was spoken about here:

Molyneux talks Fable 3, 4 and 5

[Jimbo1425]

three links to all the same thread amd three laughs to match up to it

[moonfever]

Originally Posted by SnowyFable

Oh, awesome! Should I make this front page news?

I think so. It really should be.
I'm so happy there will be more. I can never get enough Fable games.

[Jimbo1425]

why wasnt it made front page news when PM first talked about about 2 or 3 weeks ago

[moonfever]

Originally Posted by Jimbo1425

why wasnt it made front page news when PM first talked about about 2 or 3 weeks ago

I guess it better show up, fast then. Cause that's big news.

[GameStopPro]

i think it should only be front page news if lionhead/ microsoft gives out a lil quote or hint to be more of the fables such as if a fable 3,4,5 ... then that *not this one* would be more front page material. because it is lacking in being official offical news ex) qoutes, screen caps, photos, and other sorts of documentations...


also i would like to add on my own opinoin... i doubt a 4 and 5 honestly would come out unless some brilliant persons find some funny/ amazing ideas.... i could see them making an ulternate universe maybe or like going back in time 1000years, RLYRLYRLY doubt outer space stuff and other sorts of futurestic stuff because it would make it dumb.................well hmm now im changing my mind they could go up to 4 but seriously NOT 5........ =o if they change it too much anyway then it shouldnt be called fable?

[hook coast god]

fable has no official story timeline, there are no trade mark timelines, and the game is not meant to be realistic.. so the game could zig-zag, spiral, and do anything but go straight...
ever notice how none of the zelda games never have more than 2 games strung together in sequence?